Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Timely resolution under the IBC was held to outweigh an indefinitely delayed plan approval process where the post-remand refiling timeline was missed, no extension or condonation was sought, and defects in the approval application remained unresolved for months. The Appellate Tribunal held that extension beyond the outer limit is reserved for exceptional cases where delay stems from legal proceedings or factors not attributable to the parties, which was not shown here because the delay was caused by the resolution professional and the committee of creditors. Liquidation was therefore upheld, and the challenge to the rejection of the plan failed. Adverse remarks against the resolution professional were also sustained as fact-based and supported by the record.
Timely resolution under the IBC was held to outweigh an indefinitely delayed plan approval process where the post-remand refiling timeline was missed, no extension or condonation was sought, and defects in the approval application remained unresolved for months. The Appellate Tribunal held that extension beyond the outer limit is reserved for exceptional cases where delay stems from legal proceedings or factors not attributable to the parties, which was not shown here because the delay was caused by the resolution professional and the committee of creditors. Liquidation was therefore upheld, and the challenge to the rejection of the plan failed. Adverse remarks against the resolution professional were also sustained as fact-based and supported by the record.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.