Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96207 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Timely resolution under the IBC was held to outweigh an indefinitely delayed plan approval process where the post-remand refiling timeline was missed, no extension or condonation was sought, and defects in the approval application remained unresolved for months. The Appellate Tribunal held that extension beyond the outer limit is reserved for exceptional cases where delay stems from legal proceedings or factors not attributable to the parties, which was not shown here because the delay was caused by the resolution professional and the committee of creditors. Liquidation was therefore upheld, and the challenge to the rejection of the plan failed. Adverse remarks against the resolution professional were also sustained as fact-based and supported by the record.
Timely resolution under the IBC was held to outweigh an indefinitely delayed plan approval process where the post-remand refiling timeline was missed, no extension or condonation was sought, and defects in the approval application remained unresolved for months. The Appellate Tribunal held that extension beyond the outer limit is reserved for exceptional cases where delay stems from legal proceedings or factors not attributable to the parties, which was not shown here because the delay was caused by the resolution professional and the committee of creditors. Liquidation was therefore upheld, and the challenge to the rejection of the plan failed. Adverse remarks against the resolution professional were also sustained as fact-based and supported by the record.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.