Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Reversal of Cenvat Credit

Murari Agrawal

Dear Experts,

We are manufacturing parts of footwear (64062000) & paying duty @6% as per entry S.No.5A of notification no. 5/2006/CE dated 1.3.2006 as amended. The duty on our inputs is 12%. As a result, the Cenvat Credit is not utilised fully and is being accumulated and carried forward. We are not taking SSI exemption and paying duty from day one. Letter opting for notification no. 8/2003 as amended is submitted every year.

During the course of Audit, C.E.Officer has given a spot memo asking ' why excess amount of Cenvat Credit, which is brought forwarded to next year, has not been reversed when you are availing Concessional rate of Duty on the final products'.

I think there is no such requirement in law. I solicit your valued opinion on the issue.

Footwear parts manufacturer disputes need to reverse Cenvat Credit; seeks legal basis for audit team's demand. A manufacturer of footwear parts is facing an issue where the Central Excise Officer questioned the non-reversal of accumulated Cenvat Credit, despite availing a concessional duty rate. The manufacturer argues there is no legal requirement for such a reversal. An expert, responding to the query, advises that there is no need to reverse the Cenvat Credit and suggests asking the audit team to specify the legal provision under which they demand this reversal. The discussion centers on the interpretation of duty structures and compliance with the Central Excise Act. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues