Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

foreign agent commission

satbir singhwahi

Assessee has paid foreign agent commission , and has submitted shipping bill copy which reflects commisssion amount, bank TT copy of payment & invoice of the agent . The A.O. wants to disallow this foregn commission saying nature of services not proved. Whether the evidence given  of TT, SB & inv. not sufficient. Any views ?

Assessing Officer Challenges Foreign Agent Commission Despite Compliance with RBI Circular on FOB Value Limits An assessee paid a foreign agent commission and provided supporting documents, including a shipping bill, bank transfer copy, and agent invoice. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) intends to disallow the commission, questioning the nature of services provided. A respondent referenced an RBI master circular, stating commissions up to 12.50% of the FOB value are permissible, contingent on the commission being declared in the shipping bill. Despite compliance, the A.O. remains firm in disallowing the commission. The discussion seeks clarity on whether the provided evidence suffices to justify the commission. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues