Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Sale of Packing Material U/ 5(3) of CST Act

Chetan Deshpande

Facts:

A Dealer, engaged in manufacturing of Glass Ampoules & Tubular Vials in Maharashtra, sold to a pharma Company who has exported medicins packed in Glass Ampoules & Tubular Vials which are supplied by the Dealer in the financial year 2007-08. Now the dealer is claiming the sale of said Glass Ampoules & Tubular Vials as penaltimate sales u/s 5(3) of the CST Act,1956. Accordingly the Dealer has obtained Certificate from the Buyer in Form H as prescribed u/r 12(10) of CST Rules along with proof of export.

But the Assessing Officer has denied the said claim rellying on Notification No CST 2002/CR-30-A/Taxation-2 Dt 01.05.2002. and asking Form C instead of Form H alongwith prescribed certificate in the said notification.

Please clear the legality of the notification.

Dealer Challenges Rejection of Penultimate Sales Claim Under Section 5(3) of CST Act Citing Supreme Court Ruling A dealer in Maharashtra, who manufactures glass ampoules and tubular vials, sold these to a pharmaceutical company that exported medicines in the financial year 2007-08. The dealer claims these sales as penultimate sales under Section 5(3) of the CST Act, 1956, supported by a Form H certificate from the buyer and export proof. However, the Assessing Officer rejected this claim, citing a 2002 notification requiring Form C and a specific certificate. A reply references a relevant Supreme Court judgment, State of Karnataka v. Azad Coach Builders (P) Ltd., to address the legality of the notification. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues