Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 4461
Like 0 Bookmark

Taxabilty on civil work construction under UPVAT act

Date 03 Aug 2012
Replies 4 Replies
Views 6193 Views
Works contract tax applies to developer-built residential construction sold after completion, subject to fact-specific assessment.
Construction of residential complexes carried out by a developer on its own account is treated as a taxable works contract under the WCT provisions; subsequent transfer of completed units by registered sale deeds does not, by itself, remove the tax character of the construction activity. The K. Raheja decision is fact-specific and not automatically applicable; each case must be assessed on its facts to determine whether construction was commissioned by purchasers or executed by the developer from its own funds. (AI Summary)

Dear Sir, 

That the appellant, it had purchased land from the different parties in different location in AGRA. Thereafter plans of the residential apartment sanctioned by the competent authorities, after completion of constriction transferred to the interested person by way sale in different  deeds, common areas and facilities, such as lobby, parking, publics amenities etc. as approved in the layout plan was to remain the property of the appellant and no rights would  accrue to the interested parties and it continued to be the appellant. can the  decision of the hon’ble  Supreme Court in the case of K. Raheja Development Corporation V/s State of Karnataka is applicable in this case under UPVAT act

With regards 

J.S. Uppal

4 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues