Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 4089
Like 0 Bookmark

simultaneous penalty sustainable?

Date 26 Apr 2012
Replies 3 Replies
Views 5508 Views
Asked by
Penalty mutual exclusivity: simultaneous imposition under Section 76 and Section 78 is not permissible; impose only one penalty.
Penalties for failure to pay and for suppression/concealment are mutually exclusive and should not be imposed simultaneously for the same offence; the 2008 proviso expressly barred concurrent penalties and tribunals and high courts have applied that principle, often sustaining the suppression penalty alone or exercising appellate discretion to delete the payment failure penalty when mens rea is not made out. (AI Summary)

hai experts,

As per an OIO issued on us by the Additional Commissioner, penalties under sec 76 & 78 of the FA,1994 are simultaneously imposed. is that sustainable?

period of dispute: 4/ 2006 to 9/2009

issue: short payment of ST in connection with the CFA services provided

penalties imposed as per the OIO:

(a) Rs. 100/- per day from the defaulted payment of Service Tax till 17-4-2006 and thereafter Rs. 200/-per day till 10-5-2008 Under Sec 76 of the  FA,1994

(b) Rs. 5000/- Under Sec 77 of the FA, 1994

(c ) Amount equal to the short payment alleged Under Sec 78 of the  FA,1994 

is that sustainable in view of the changes from 10-5-2008?

3 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues