Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

40A(3) payments

LAKSHMISH IYENGAR

Sir, My client is a trader is APMC yard and he buys food grains from agriculturists and sells the same to different dealers. The goods will be sent to other states in the country. In the entire year on 7 occasions  he has made payments in excess of Rs.20,000/- by way cash to truck drivers to transport the goods. The same amount is mentioned in the sale bills and the money is recovered from the buyers. In the books of accounts freight charges are debited and parties accounts are credited as freight charges. While concluding the assessment the assessing officer has made an addition of Rs.1,27,000/- u/s. 40A(3) stating that as the payments are made by cash the expenses are disallowed.  Sufficient proof was produced at the time of hearing still it was not accepted.  Now I have filed an appeal and I have quoted Allahabad HC. CIT Vs. Rajs Pal Automobiles (2009 (6) TMI 565 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT). I request you to through some more light on this issue.

Regards.

Trader Challenges Disallowed Cash Payments Over Rs. 20,000; Appeals Using Section 40A(3) Case References for Support A trader operating in an APMC yard made cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 on seven occasions to truck drivers for transporting food grains, which were later recovered from buyers and recorded as freight charges in the accounts. The assessing officer disallowed these expenses under Section 40A(3), adding Rs. 1,27,000 to the trader's income despite provided proof. An appeal was filed, referencing a case from the Allahabad High Court. A suggestion was made to consider another case, G.A. Road Carriers versus Income-tax Officer, for additional support in the appeal process. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues