Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID : 2265
- 0 -

SERVICE OF NOTICE U/S 143 (2)

Date 29 Sep 2010
Replies2 Answers
Views 1621 Views
Asked By

Dear All Members, I want a clarification on the above mentioned section . Whether the notice issued u/s 143 (2) must be dated latest by 29th September , 2010 against A.Y. 2009 - 10 and it must be served to the assessee concerned within the period of 6 month i.e. 30th Sep.,2010 or it must be received by the assessee latest by 30th september ,2010 latest by the end of normal working hours i.e.up to 5.00 p.m. of 30th september ,2010 ? or It may be received by the assessee even after 30th sep.,2010 . Another querry is , whether the notice can be served to the C.A.of the assessee in case of non - availability of the assessee and the premises of the assessee locked since last 6 months ? I will be highly oblidged if somebody can clarify the issue. Thanks to all

BAL KRISHAN GARG

2 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
- 0
Replied on Sep 29, 2010
1.

The notice must be served lastest by 30th Sep. The notice may be dated even 30th Sep also and can be served by hand even after 5pm also.

- 0
Replied on Sep 29, 2010
2. It is for the Revenue to establish that the person to whom the notice was served was authorised by the assessee to receive it. It was so held in CIT v. Rajesh Kumar Sharma [2009] 311 ITR 235 (Delhi).

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues