Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Addition made on Lumpsum basis on account of payment of labour charges in cash

Kishor Deshpande

One of my client, a civil contractor, paying labour charges on cash basis ( payments do not violate the provision of Section 40A(3). But the assessing officer disallowed Rs. 4,50,000 out of labour charges on lumpsum basis and gave the reason in AO that due to payments made in cash I am disallowing the same. Is there any decision given by the Courts against such vies of AO ?

Contractor's Cash Payments Disallowed Despite Section 40A(3) Compliance; Must Prove Legitimacy with Detailed Evidence and Case Law Support. A civil contractor's payments for labor charges made in cash were disallowed by an assessing officer, who cited the cash payments as the reason for disallowance, despite compliance with Section 40A(3). The contractor sought legal precedents to challenge this decision. A respondent advised that the contractor must prove the legitimacy of the expenses with detailed evidence and consider the opportunity provided for justification. The outcome would depend on the specific facts and circumstances, and relevant case law could support the contractor's position. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues