Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 1722
Like 0 Bookmark

Appeal - rectification of mistakes - section 74

Date 20 Jan 2010
Replies 8 Replies
Views 16598 Views
Rectification of mistakes: pursue tribunal appeal with delay condonation while filing rectification at the adjudicating authority.
A taxpayer sought rectification under Section 74 after a Service Tax demand was upheld on appeal; the Commissioner (Appeals) directed filing the rectification with the original adjudicating authority. Contributors advise that questions of law can be raised at any stage, that the Commissioner (Appeals) generally cannot rectify an order absent a true mistake, and that the taxpayer should pursue a tribunal appeal with delay condonation and stay while also filing rectification at the original authority to preserve remedies. (AI Summary)

One of our clients had received SCN from the Service Tax Department. He had submitted his reply to the same and the Addl Commissioner passed the OIO against the client. The client appealed against the same to the Commissioner Appeals. The Commissioner Appeals confirmed the demand. Then the client realised that some of the important points were missed out and he filed an appeal for Rectification of Mistakes u/s. 74 of the  Finance Act, 1994 to the Commissioner Appeals. The Commissioner Appeals after 2 months of filing the appeal returned the appeal stating - "...that the application for Rectification of Mistake under Section 74 of the  Finance Act, 1994, is to be submitted to the original adjucating authority as no such provision is prescribed under Section 74 to approach the appellate authority for the same...." My question is - - Is it as good as remand back? - Should our client approach the Addl. Commissioner with the Rectification of Mistake and then start from there? - Should he approach CESTAT only? / Simultaneously while submitting Rectification of Mistakes to the Addl Commissioner? - Anything else? I want your views of the forum on the same....

8 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues