Respected Rama Krishna Ji , I am attaching here the draft of Application under RTI . Whether the same is correct ? if not please advice . APPLICATION FOR SEEKING INFORMATION UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT – 2005 ------------------------------------------ To, Date 02/11/2009 Central Public Information Officer , Service Tax ,Division – I, 37,Nehru Place , NEW DELHI – 110019 ----------------- Sir , Subject : Application under Right to Information Act ,2005 --------------------------------------- Ref.: DL – I /ST/R-II/SOF/MEPL/42/08 ------------------------------ 1.NAME OF THE APPLICANT : BAL KRISHAN GARG 2.NATIONALITY / CITIZENSHIP: INDIAN 3.PERMANENT ADDRESS: 231 – A ,POCKET – E , G.T.B.ENCLAVE,DELHI -93 4.PHONE NO. : 011 – 22115588 ,9810543831 5.ADDRESS FOR : 231 – A,POCKET – E, CORRESPONDENCE G.T.B.ENCLAVE , DELHI -93 With reference to the above mentioned , the following informations are required : 1. Copies of all correspondence between the concerned Asstt.Commissioner, Division - I to the Deputy Commissioner ( Audit ) , Service Tax Commissionerate , New Delhi during the proceedings of the case held since its beginning to 15th Sep., 09. 2.Copy of Grounds provided by the AGCR Auditors 3.Copy of all letters / details received from M/S Marc Enterprises (P) Ltd. in this regard. 6.The above information can be send me by speed post on the address mentioned above . Additional Fees may be charged to cover the cost of delivery . 7.Without prejudice to my rights under RTI Act 2005 , to facilitate faster retrieval of information , I would like to state that the information could be available at Division – I ,37 ,Nehru Place ,New Delhi – 110019 . 8.I state that the information sought does not fall within the restrictions contained in section 8 and 9 of the Act & to the best of my knowledge it pertains to your office. Fees of Rs. 10 / + Rs. 100 /- th.P.O are enclosed
RTI application
BAL KRISHAN GARG
Right to Information request seeks disclosure of internal correspondence and audit grounds under the RTI Act. An RTI application requests copies of all correspondence between Division I and the Deputy Commissioner (Audit) during the case, the audit grounds provided by AGCR Auditors, and all letters received from a named private entity; it identifies the custodian office, requests postal delivery with additional fees, and asserts the information is not subject to statutory disclosure restrictions. (AI Summary)
TaxTMI
TaxTMI