Respected Rama Krishna Ji , I am attaching here the draft of Application under RTI . Whether the same is correct ? if not please advice . APPLICATION FOR SEEKING INFORMATION UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT β 2005 ------------------------------------------ To, Date 02/11/2009 Central Public Information Officer , Service Tax ,Division β I, 37,Nehru Place , NEW DELHI β 110019 ----------------- Sir , Subject : Application under Right to Information Act ,2005 --------------------------------------- Ref.: DL β I /ST/R-II/SOF/MEPL/42/08 ------------------------------ 1.NAME OF THE APPLICANT : BAL KRISHAN GARG 2.NATIONALITY / CITIZENSHIP: INDIAN 3.PERMANENT ADDRESS: 231 β A ,POCKET β E , G.T.B.ENCLAVE,DELHI -93 4.PHONE NO. : 011 β 22115588 ,9810543831 5.ADDRESS FOR : 231 β A,POCKET β E, CORRESPONDENCE G.T.B.ENCLAVE , DELHI -93 With reference to the above mentioned , the following informations are required : 1. Copies of all correspondence between the concerned Asstt.Commissioner, Division - I to the Deputy Commissioner ( Audit ) , Service Tax Commissionerate , New Delhi during the proceedings of the case held since its beginning to 15th Sep., 09. 2.Copy of Grounds provided by the AGCR Auditors 3.Copy of all letters / details received from M/S Marc Enterprises (P) Ltd. in this regard. 6.The above information can be send me by speed post on the address mentioned above . Additional Fees may be charged to cover the cost of delivery . 7.Without prejudice to my rights under RTI Act 2005 , to facilitate faster retrieval of information , I would like to state that the information could be available at Division β I ,37 ,Nehru Place ,New Delhi β 110019 . 8.I state that the information sought does not fall within the restrictions contained in section 8 and 9 of the Act & to the best of my knowledge it pertains to your office. Fees of Rs. 10 / + Rs. 100 /- th.P.O are enclosed
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


TaxTMI
TaxTMI