Under the scheme of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“CGST Act”), Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) is governed primarily by Section 16, which permits a registered person to avail credit of input tax charged on any supply of goods or services used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of business, subject to prescribed conditions.
Ocean freight services provided by a shipping line to an exporter qualify as “input services” where such services are integrally connected with the export of goods. Exports are treated as “zero-rated supplies” under Section 16 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“IGST Act”). Accordingly, the exporter is entitled either to (i) export under bond/LUT without payment of tax and claim refund of unutilized ITC, or (ii) export on payment of IGST and claim refund of such tax.
Where GST is charged at 5% on ocean freight, the concessional rate is typically notified subject to a condition that the supplier (shipping line) shall not avail ITC on input goods/services used in supplying such service. This restriction flows from the relevant rate notification (e.g., Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate)) and applies specifically to the supplier. There is no express statutory bar under the CGST Act denying ITC to the recipient (exporter) merely because the supplier has opted for a concessional rate with restricted credit.
Therefore, the exporter, being the recipient of taxable supply, remains eligible to avail ITC of GST charged (even at 5%), provided the conditions under Section 16 and 17 of the CGST Act are fulfilled, including possession of tax invoice and receipt of service. Such ITC forms part of the electronic credit ledger and can be utilized either for (a) set-off against output tax liability, or (b) refund as unutilized ITC in case of zero-rated supplies under Section 54 of the CGST Act read with Section 16 of the IGST Act.
There is no legal requirement that ITC to the exporter is available only where GST is charged at 18%. The rate of tax (5% or 18%) does not, per se, determine the eligibility of ITC to the recipient unless a specific statutory restriction exists against the recipient, which is absent in the present context. Hence, denial of ITC solely on the ground that ocean freight is taxed at 5% would not be sustainable in law.