Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Impact of the Flipkart–Walmart landmark judgment on FII/FDI and startup investment climate

Fahiyaz Ahmmed

Dear Experts,

While the Supreme Court's judgment in the Flipkart-Walmart deal is legally correct under DTAA and GAAR principles, what could be its broader impact on FII and FDI inflows, especially in loss-making but high-growth startups where investments are based on future valuation rather than current profits? As India positions itself as the world’s third-largest economy, but with relatively low per-capita income and currency pressure against the US dollar, does such a strict interpretation risk creating a bottleneck for foreign investment, employment generation, and GDP growth? What liberal policy or legal reforms can the government consider to balance revenue protection with the need to attract long-term FII/FDI, and what remedial steps should startups adopt to remain attractive to global investors post this landmark judgment?

Flipkart-Walmart judgment's strict GAAR and DTAA reading may raise risks and costs for foreign investment in startups. Strict application of GAAR and a narrow DTAA reading in the Flipkart-Walmart judgment prioritises substance over form, increases scrutiny of treaty benefits and tax driven structures, and may raise risk and cost of capital for foreign investment in high growth, loss making startups; policymakers should offer prospective clarity, substance based incentives, and treaty modernisation, while startups should bolster commercial substance and documentation. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Sadanand Bulbule on Jan 23, 2026

The Supreme Court’s interpretation is legally correct and aligned with global anti-abuse norms. However, without clear policy guidance and prospective certainty, such strict interpretation risks increasing the cost of capital, dampening FII/FDI sentiment-especially for high-growth startups-and creating uncertainty in investment flows and economic growth. A balanced approach through clear tax rules, substance-based incentives, and modernised tax treaties is essential to protect revenue while sustaining investor confidence, jobs, and long-term growth.

Fahiyaz Ahmmed on Jan 23, 2026

Thank you sir your valuable reply 

 

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues