Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 120701
Like 0 Bookmark

Penalty for same offence on two deemed taxable persons

Date 08 Jan 2026
Replies 1 Reply
Views 436 Views
GST penalty duplication: identical penalties cannot be imposed on both the document-holder and the operator for the same invoices.
Where operational control, banking, filings and invoice issuance were exercised by one person (Y) and X merely provided documents and received commission, treating both as deemed taxable person and imposing identical penalties duplicates liability; penalty should attach to the actual perpetrator who exercised control and mens rea, not be imposed equally on the document-holder. (AI Summary)

Dear experts,

One taxable person (say X) opened a GST firm. During DGGI search, x  said the firm was opened by Y with his documents, all return filing, banking operations, invoice issuance were done by Y & also admitted that no real transactions done except billing & also admitted that he received certain commission from Y. and during search his business place also not found.

Y in his statements did not agree to the statements of X.

Now in OIO the GST department treated  both X & Y as deemed taxable person

& also said that the firm was opened, operated and controlled by Y.

Imposed penalty u/s 122(1(vii) and 122(1) (ii) for the same amount on both these persons thereby duplicating the amount.

Plz guide whether the action of the GST dept is as per law.

My client is X, whether the facts & statements given by X in search & after that in OIO, the confirmation of the dept also that the firm was opened, operated, controlled by Y will help in getting relief from the penalty to X

1 answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide

No Replies are present.

Recent Issues