Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Proceedings against Supplier and Recipient for non payment of tax

Ganesh S

Dear All,

During investigation, amounts were recovered from the recipient as ineligible ITC for the reason the supplier had not paid the taxes. Later, proceedings were initiated against the supplier and order passed confirming the demand towards non-payment of tax which covers the above transaction related to ineligible ITC. 

SCN is now issued on the recipient to appropriate the recovery made during investigation. Are there decisions which prohibits issuance of SCN on the recipient when the proceedings are already concluded against the supplier for the same issue (GST/VAT). 

Thanks. 

SC ruling limits ITC recovery from recipients for supplier GST default, stressing Section 16 and CBIC guidance A recipient's ineligible input tax credit (ITC) was recovered during investigation because the supplier had not paid GST. Subsequently, demand proceedings against the supplier were concluded for non-payment of tax, covering the same transactions. A show cause notice has now been issued to the recipient to appropriate the recovered amount, prompting the query whether such notice is permissible when proceedings on the same issue are already concluded against the supplier. The cited Supreme Court order, upholding a High Court decision, indicates authorities must first proceed against the supplier and may proceed against the recipient only in exceptional circumstances as clarified by CBIC, with the revenue's special leave petition dismissed. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues