Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

tenant registered in another state taking property on rent from unregistered person in another state

Sushil Kumar Tibrewal

My company is registered in Gujrat and taking property situated in Delhi on rent from an unregistered person for registered office only. how to pay gst on RCM basis? whether my company should take registration in delhi also 

Company leasing inter-state property from unregistered landlord must register and pay GST under Section 24(iii) RCM rules A company registered in one state leasing property located in another state from an unregistered landlord must pay GST under reverse charge mechanism (RCM). According to Section 24(iii) of the CGST Act, persons liable to pay tax under RCM are required to obtain registration in the state where the service is received. Since the rented property is in a different state, the company must register there to discharge its GST liability. The place of supply being the location of the property, GST is payable to that state's authorities. Although some opinions suggest that registration in every state of RCM liability is not mandatory, the prevailing interpretation mandates registration in the state of consumption to comply with GST provisions and avoid legal risks. The unregistered status of the landlord does not exempt the recipient from RCM obligations. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Sadanand Bulbule on Jul 25, 2025

Yes. In terms of Section 24(iii) of the CGST Act, a person liable to pay tax under RCM must take registration in the State where such services are received.

Sushil Kumar Tibrewal on Jul 25, 2025

sadanand bulbule ji,

In 24(iii) only registration word is used. and my company is already registered. 

 

Sadanand Bulbule on Jul 25, 2025

Plz re-visit your query and refer the following:

Compulsory registration in certain cases.

24. Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 22, the following categories of persons shall be required to be registered under this Act,––

(i) XXXX

(ii) XXXX

(iii) persons who are required to pay tax under reverse charge

In terms of the above statutory position, you need to take registration at Delhi also. If you have any further doubts, plz feel free to post them.

VENU K on Jul 25, 2025

In my humble opinion Section 24(iii) does not say that you need to be registered in every State where reverse charge tax liability arises — only that you must be registered somewhere to discharge RCM liability.

  • You (recipient) are registered in Gujarat,

  • Property is in Delhi (different state),

  • This is an inter-state supply under Section 7 of IGST Act,

  • You are liable to pay IGST under RCM.

Sushil Kumar Tibrewal on Jul 25, 2025

unregistered landlord is also residing in Delhi

Sadanand Bulbule on Jul 25, 2025

 Refer Issue ID : 120235. Much water has flown on the same subject.

Sushil Kumar Tibrewal on Jul 25, 2025

unregistered landlord is also residing in Delhi

Sushil Kumar Tibrewal on Jul 25, 2025

VENU K  JI

IN THE ABOVE CASE LAND LORD IS ALSO RESIDING IN DELHI 

Sadanand Bulbule on Jul 25, 2025

 The GST regime has been rolled out with effect from July 01, 2017 is a destination or consumption-based tax regime. In other words, GST is a tax on goods and/or services that gets accrued to the State/UT where they are actually consumed. The basic principle of this taxation regime is the States/UTs get GST on all goods actually consumed in their State/UT irrespective of where they are manufactured. The basic principle of this taxation regime is the States/UTs get GST on all goods/services actually consumed in their State/UT.

In this background, the provision of Section 24[iii] of the CGST Act comes into play as the rental services are consumed in the geographical territory of Delhi. So tax on such transaction under RCM is due to Delhi.

KALLESHAMURTHY MURTHY K.N. on Jul 25, 2025

 I agree with Sadanand Bulbule, Sir. The place of supply is Delhi, and IGST is not applicable.  A registered person taking property on rent from an unregistered person is liable to tax under RCM. Therefore, it is necessary to obtain registration in Delhi, where the services are supplied.

Shilpi Jain on Jul 26, 2025

The RCM liability on renting of the commercial property does not arise if person is un-registered.

Unlike GTA, liability under RCM exists, whether or not the recipient is registered. In such cases, s 24 will apply and one may need to take registration mandatorily to pay off the RCM liability.

In this case one may take a stand that the person is not registered in Delhi and so not liable to RCM. Though could be a disputed stand.

Also in this case liability being CGST & SGST of Delhi, it is not possible to make such tax payment, even if it is considered that there is GST liability in the present case.

 

Sadanand Bulbule on Jul 26, 2025

My above posts are in terms of Section 8(2) read with Section 12(3) (a) & (b) of the IGST Act, 2017. Any little mis interpration is likely to shake the essence of the GST Act-the place of supply of service. Choice is left the querist to be prudent or otherwise. Risk cannot be the reward.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues