Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Input Tax Credit Claim In Wrong Head

MAHTAB KHAN

A taxpayer inadvertently claimed Input Tax Credit pertaining to IGST—under the heads of CGST and SGST in GSTR-3B. The tax invoice was correctly reflecting IGST liability, but while filing the return, the ITC was claimed under the wrong heads due to a clerical error. Will the taxpayer still be eligible to avail the benefit of ITC under section 16 of the CGST Act?

Taxpayer's wrong-head ITC claim under Section 16 remains valid despite clerical error in GSTR-3B filing A taxpayer mistakenly claimed Input Tax Credit for IGST under CGST and SGST heads in GSTR-3B due to clerical error, despite the tax invoice correctly showing IGST liability. Legal experts confirmed ITC remains admissible under Section 16 if substantive conditions are met, as there's no revenue loss to government. Kerala High Court precedent supports this position, ruling such head allocation errors are revenue-neutral and don't justify recovery demands. Courts generally take liberal view on wrong-head ITC claims, treating credits under various heads as common pool, allowing rectification or adjustment in future returns within time limits. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues