Your queries touch upon the nuances of Input Service Distributor (ISD) mechanism under GST, particularly with respect to rental invoices and place of supply (PoS).
Here's a point-by-point response based on applicable GST law and interpretive guidance:
1. Should the Rent Invoice of the Haryana Office Be Issued to ISD or to Regular GST Registration?
Answer:
The rent invoice of the Haryana office should be issued to the regular GST registration of the Haryana branch, not to the ISD registration. Here’s why:
- ISD is only a mechanism for distributing credit, not a separate place of business.
- A service such as rent — which is tied to a specific location and place of supply — must be invoiced to the GSTIN of the state where the property is located. This is mandated under Section 12(3)(a) of the IGST Act, which provides that:
“the place of supply of services directly in relation to an immovable property shall be the location of the immovable property.”
Hence, since the rented office is located in Haryana, the landlord must issue the tax invoice to the Haryana GSTIN, not to the ISD (which would typically be in Karnataka).
2. If the Rent Invoice Is Taken Under ISD, Can the Credit Be Distributed Based on Expense Attribution, Even If PoS Is Different?
Answer:
From a compliance perspective, credit should ideally not be taken under ISD for location-specific services like rent tied to immovable property in another state.
However, assuming rent is wrongly or intentionally invoiced to the ISD, here's what the law and interpretation suggest:
- ISD is permitted to distribute ITC even where the place of supply differs, as long as the credit is eligible and expense is attributable to more than one location.
- In your case, if the corporate office rent is used for company-wide activities (e.g., administrative, marketing, management), it may be attributable to multiple units and can arguably be distributed.
- Distribution should follow Rule 39 of CGST Rules, which does not restrict distribution solely based on PoS; rather, it permits allocation in proportion to turnover or usage.
However, this is a grey area, and risk of dispute exists because the original place of supply is Haryana, and distributing it to other states could be challenged by the department on the grounds of incorrect ITC flow.
⚠️ Best Practice / Recommendation:
- Receive rent invoices on the Haryana GSTIN (regular registration).
- If the rent is used for HO/admin functions across branches, cross-charge the common costs from Haryana to Karnataka and Maharashtra, instead of routing via ISD.
- Reserve ISD for common input services like software licenses, consulting, advertising, etc., where PoS is not tied to immovable property.
📝 Conclusion:
Scenario | Recommended Action |
Rent invoice for Haryana premises | Issue to Haryana regular GSTIN |
Want to allocate rent across states | Use cross-charge from Haryana to other branches |
Using ISD for rent (not recommended) | Distribute only if invoice is on ISD and expense relates to all branches, but ensure strong justification |
***