Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 119925
Like 0 Bookmark

Section 161

Date 25 Apr 2025
Replies 16 Replies
Views 8686 Views
Asked by
Rectification of apparent mistake under GST can correct duplicate tax demands where tax was voluntarily discharged.
Dispute concerns failure to adjust an adjudication demand for tax already discharged via return filing, raising whether that non adjustment is an apparent mistake rectifiable under rectification procedure. Facts: enforcement accepted voluntary payment in the return; a later audit order duplicated the demand without hearing. Operative remedies discussed are rectification for apparent mistakes, reliance on departmental circulars confirming return payment as valid adjustment, and, if authorities refuse or time limits bar relief, pursuing a writ remedy to secure correction despite portal or procedural constraints. (AI Summary)

Hi all,

Client received an adjudication order U/s 73 demanding Tax from the Proper Officer (Audit), But prior to the adjudication, enforcement had raised the same issue and accepted the liability payment in GSTR-3B next financial year. The audit officer did not give opportunity of being heard before passing the order.

Assessee filed appeal. To avail benefit U.s 128A, withdrew the appeal and filed SPL-02. The officer is given SCN for rejecting application in Form SPL-03.

Whether the adjustment of liability not done by the department can be rectified U/s 161, though beyond time period. Whether it is apparent mistake?

Thanks

16 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues