Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 119668
Like 0 Bookmark

COTTON. WRONG PAYMENT OF TAX UNDER FCM.

Date 01 Mar 2025
Replies 8 Replies
Views 1060 Views
Double taxation: tax paid under FCM cannot be re-demanded as RCM; appeal advisable despite deposit hurdle.
Taxpayer paid tax under the forward charge mechanism on raw cotton purchases though liability lay under the reverse charge mechanism; the adjudicating authority issued consolidated assessments under penalty provisions without crediting the FCM payments. Rectification is unlikely because the error is not apparent on the record; the advised remedy is to pursue the appeal procedure arguing against double taxation, though a deposit requirement to file the appeal poses a practical hurdle. (AI Summary)

Dear experts

In terms of Notification No.43/2017-CTR dated 14/11/2017, a registered person is liable to pay tax under RMC on purchase of "Raw cotton from agriculturist" under Section 9[3] of the CGST Act.

However a taxpayer under the influence of misguidance, has paid tax under FCM on supply of such Raw cotton purchased from agriculturists and it is manifest in the books of account and financial statements.

But the Adjudicating Authority has again levied tax/interest/penalty by way of a consolidated order for five years under Section 74 on such purchase under RMC without considering the actual of payment of tax under FCM by the taxpayer.

Although there is procedural lapse, what are adverse revenue implications? And what is the remedy? An appeal under Section 107 or a rectification under Section 161?

Plz clarify.

8 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues