Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Partner Remuneration

CABayyaReddy DK

Sir/Madam,

In a company, director salary paid u/s. 192 of the Income Tax Act - RCM is not applicable.

Other than salary in a company- any amount paid other than loan or advance attracts the RCM liability.

In case of Partnership firm or LLP - Whether Partner remuneration attracts the RCM liability? Please advice

Debate on GST Liability: Is Partner Remuneration in LLPs Subject to Reverse Charge Mechanism? Exploring Tax Law Interpretations. A discussion on a forum revolves around whether partner remuneration in a partnership firm or LLP is subject to Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) under GST. One participant argues that partner remuneration is liable to GST since partners are not considered employees. Others counter that RCM does not apply, as partners are owners, not employees, and their remuneration is akin to a share of profits. They suggest that GST should not be applicable as it constitutes self-service. The discussion includes reference to case law and differing opinions on the potential for litigation and the interpretation of related tax laws. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues