Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Section 16 (2) (c)

Komal Agarwal

One of my client purchased goods and paid to supplier during FY 2018-19. Supplier filed GSTR-1 properly and filed GSTR-3B Nil. Later department cancelled supplier’s GST no with retrospectively. Now the SCN issued by department to us referring section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act for payment of tax with interest as the supplier did not deposited the amount to department. What remedy available to us. Please refer case law also in tax payer’s favor.

Client Faces Tax Notice Under Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act Despite Meeting ITC Conditions; Experts Advise Contesting. A client purchased goods in FY 2018-19, and the supplier, who filed GSTR-1 correctly but GSTR-3B as Nil, had their GST registration canceled retroactively. The tax department issued a notice under Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act for tax payment with interest due to the supplier's failure to deposit taxes. Experts suggest contesting the notice, arguing that the client fulfilled all conditions for Input Tax Credit (ITC) and should not be penalized for the supplier's fault. They recommend presenting documentary evidence to support the genuineness of the transaction and consulting a professional for a comprehensive legal strategy. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues