Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Case Points for IGST reversed instead of CGST

Vineet Agrawal

The taxpayer had mistakenly reversed IGST ITC instead of CGST ITC. He has been issued a notice. Is there any helpful case laws citing both the taxes are collected by the Centre

Taxpayer's Mistaken IGST ITC Reversal Sparks Debate; Case Laws Highlight Revenue Neutrality and Unrectifiable Error in GSTR-3B. A taxpayer mistakenly reversed IGST ITC instead of CGST ITC and received a notice. The discussion includes references to relevant case laws from the Madras High Court that may support the taxpayer's position, emphasizing that both taxes are collected by the Centre. One contributor inquires about the timing of the error and its identification. Another suggests that since GSTR-3B revision is not possible, the error might be argued as unrectifiable, highlighting revenue neutrality. The cited case law is considered supportive of the taxpayer's situation. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues