Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Case Points for IGST reversed instead of CGST

Vineet Agrawal

The taxpayer had mistakenly reversed IGST ITC instead of CGST ITC. He has been issued a notice. Is there any helpful case laws citing both the taxes are collected by the Centre

Mistaken reversal of IGST input tax credit may be challenged using central collection and revenue neutrality principles, despite return revision limits. Mistaken reversal of input tax credit by debiting IGST instead of CGST prompted a notice; cited Madras High Court authorities support that central taxes are collected by the Centre, informing classification arguments. Defences include timing of error detection, inability to revise GSTR 3B, and reliance on revenue neutrality to contest demand, though procedural constraints may prevent straightforward correction. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Shilpi Jain on Mar 22, 2024

When did the error happen and when was this error identified?

Shilpi Jain on Mar 22, 2024

One stand which can be taken is that since GSTR-3B revision is not possible, the error cannot be rectified in addition to the ground of revenue neutrality.

Ganeshan Kalyani on Mar 25, 2024

The case law cited by Sri Kasturi Sir would support the given query.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues