Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

itc claim under wrong head

giri gattupalli

respected sir,

one registered person during FY 2017-18 claimed 5,00,000 less input tax credit under IGST head and claimed 5,00,000 excess input tax credit under CGST & SGST heads and utilized also. . it was happed due to clerical mistake. and now notice has been issued asking to pay excess claim of input tax taken under CGST & SGST heads but silent on less claim of IGST. and department asking for interest also. how to deal with this situation. i invite our experts opinion and discussion.

thanking you

Taxpayer Mistakenly Claims Excess ITC Under Wrong Heads, Faces Repayment Demand: Legal Opinions Suggest Defense as Technical Error A registered taxpayer mistakenly claimed excess input tax credit (ITC) under the CGST and SGST heads instead of the IGST head during the fiscal year 2017-18, resulting in a notice demanding repayment and interest. The taxpayer sought advice on addressing this issue. Responses suggested providing evidence of the error and defending the claim as a technical mistake. Legal opinions varied, with some advising litigation, including potential appeals to higher courts. Previous court rulings were referenced, indicating mixed outcomes. The discussion highlighted the complexity of rectifying such errors and the potential for prolonged legal proceedings. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues