Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Rectification of the GST Order

Bayyareddy DK

My client is importer of goods and sells the goods locally. Recorded all the sales and purchases during the year 2019-2022. However, some eway bills not created by oversite. My sales are matching with Income tax returns, GST Annual returns and Form 3B sales & tax is paid fully. My declared turnover is higher than the Eway bill turnover for all the years. Officer passed an order U/s. 73(9) of the CGST Act without DIN number & levied the tax on the difference of turnover with Eway sales along with interest & penalty. Is the difference turnover again liable to GST Tax? Is it does not lead to double tax? Is this order rectifiable U/s. 161 of the CGST Act. Can the officer pass a rectification order reducing the liability? Please advice

GST Order Dispute: Turnover Mismatch Raises Double Taxation Concerns Under Section 73(9); Appeal Advised for Resolution An individual sought advice on a GST order where their client's declared turnover was higher than the E-way bill turnover, leading to a tax order under Section 73(9) of the CGST Act. The order lacked a DIN number, and the individual questioned if the turnover difference could lead to double taxation and if the order could be rectified under Section 161. Respondents advised filing an appeal, as rectification has a limited scope and might not address the issue. They emphasized the importance of appealing within the time frame and suggested that the mismatch in turnover should be justified with evidence. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues