Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Credit Notes raised in March 2019 to rectify double invoices uploaded in Sept 2018

Varsha Nagrani

I am currently facing a GST Department Audit where The tax practitioner of assessee had made a clerical error while filing GSTR-1 for Sept 2018. And recorded double invoices for all the B2B parties. However. He realized his error and rectified it by uploading credit notes for the same in March 2019. However, there was no effect whatsoever in GSTR-3B or GSTR 9 or in Books of assessee.

In such case, we are contemplating that the officer should consider the fact as error in filing of return. However, he is not considering the fact that Credit notes could have been raised.

Also, as there is no liability and just an error should interest be levied on difference in outward supply in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B

GST Audit Triggered by Duplicate Invoices in GSTR-1; No Interest Due as Error Was Clerical, Say Respondents A tax practitioner faced a GST audit due to a clerical error in filing GSTR-1 for September 2018, where duplicate B2B invoices were recorded. Credit notes were issued in March 2019 to rectify the error, but they were not reflected in GSTR-3B or GSTR-9. The department did not accept the credit notes as a correction method, and there was concern about potential interest on discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B. Respondents advised that no interest should be levied as there was no actual liability and suggested relying on sales records to demonstrate the error was clerical. They also discussed the impracticality of obtaining declarations from all parties involved. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues