Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Non preparetion of E way bill

Ashish Diwedi

We have exported goods put of India. However, being export transactions we have not prepared E way bill. Now at the time of GST audit, the department has raised objection on the same. What is the maximum penalty we are liable to pay??

Please note goods are not being intercepted and have rached the destination.

Penalty for Missing E-Way Bill in Exports: Possible Rs. 25,000, but Waivable if No Tax Evasion. A user inquired about the penalty for not preparing an e-way bill for exported goods, which was raised during a GST audit. The goods were not intercepted and reached their destination. Responses varied: one suggested a general penalty of Rs. 50,000, while another argued no penalty should apply since it was an export transaction with no tax evasion. Another response mentioned a possible penalty of up to Rs. 25,000 under the IGST Act, but noted it was not mandatory and could be reduced or waived, especially if no taxes were involved. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues