Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Revenue Expenditure

Ethirajan Parthasarathy

A partnership is into business of Layout forming and selling plots. The undeveloped land was contributed by one of the partners towards his capital. Before all sites were sold, the said partner retired and partnership was re- constituted.

As per rules in Karnataka, the Firm had to pay stamp duty and registration fee on value of sites remaining unsold.

The query is whether such payment of stamp duty and registration charges for registering the re-constituted firm is allowable expenditure u/s 37.

Stamp Duty and Registration Charges on Partner Retirement Allowable as Revenue Expenditure Under Section 37 A partnership involved in layout forming and selling plots faced a query regarding the treatment of stamp duty and registration charges paid when a partner retired, and the firm was reconstituted. The question was whether these charges are allowable as revenue expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. One response cited a Karnataka High Court ruling, supported by a Supreme Court judgment, affirming such charges as revenue expenditure. Another response noted that since the firm is in the business of selling plots, these charges could be considered recurring revenue expenditure, typically debited to the Profit and Loss Account. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
KASTURI SETHI on Nov 15, 2022

Dear Sir,

Stamp duty and registration charges are revenue expenditure as held by Karnataka High Court. This case law is based on the judgement of the Supreme Court.

2022 (9) TMI 54 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT DR. BHUJANG SHETTY VERSUS THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-5 BENGALURU

Arjun Gupta on Dec 3, 2022

Only that expenditure which is incurred wholly for the business is allowable under S.37, and at the same time it must not be capital expenditure. Since you are in the business of selling plots, the expenditure towards registration and stamp duty on reconstitution may be claimed as revenue expenditure since it is a 'recurring' expenditure on purchase and sale of plots. A recurring expenditure is usually a revenue expenditure- so you may say that stamp duty and registration charges are usually borne by me while purchasing and selling plots and the same is to be debited to P/L Account.

It would be easier to tell with further facts on record.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues