Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

levi of interest

giri gattupalli

respected sir,

it is established principle and precedent of apex court is that , ' INTEREST IS COMPENSATORY IN NATURE '. and as of now this position is still continued .and then how govt can levi interest for non discloser or short disclosure of out put tax liability if there is continuous excess of input tax credit in electronic credit ledger and where there is no loss to govt which is consequent of short disclosure of out put tax liability and where there is no requirement to pay tax in cash .please discuss it in the light of amended rule 50 .

thanking you

Debate on GST Interest Charges for Excess Input Tax Credit: Section 50 of CGST Act Explored A participant raised a query regarding the imposition of interest under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) when there is no revenue loss to the government due to excess input tax credit. They questioned the legitimacy of charging interest for non-disclosure or short disclosure of output tax liability. Respondents clarified that the relevant provision is Section 50 of the CGST Act. One respondent suggested reviewing a Supreme Court ruling but advised caution as different laws apply. Another mentioned that interest is payable unless the constitutional validity of the provision is challenged. A reference to a Madras High Court decision was also provided for further insight. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues