Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Detention of goods due to non generation of E-invoice

kumar royal

In our case, goods are transported against the tax invoice and e-way bill. However, such an invoice is not raised in accordance with Rule 48(4) on the date of interception. But immediately a day after the issuance of the detention & Seizure order, an e-invoice was raised properly. so, in this case, what will be the grounds one could take for the release of goods without payment of penalty under section 129?

Thanks in Advance.

Goods Detained for Missing E-Invoice Under Rule 48(4); Discussion on Release Without Penalty Under Section 129 A discussion on a forum addresses the detention of goods due to the non-generation of an e-invoice. The goods were transported with a tax invoice and e-way bill, but the e-invoice was not issued in compliance with Rule 48(4) at the time of interception. An e-invoice was generated the following day. Participants discuss the legal grounds for releasing the goods without penalty under Section 129, emphasizing that the situation was not an attempt to evade taxes but a procedural lapse. Reference is made to a relevant court decision, and further expert advice is suggested. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues