Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Eway Bill Reconcilation

VIGNESH

Sir. While Reconciling GSTR-1 & Eway Bill generated, there are huge differences. But all the difference are Sales done to one the Sister Concern in the same State & same District and within 10km Radius. We have now got a notice from the department seeking clarrification, how to go about it? (Salesin GSTR-1 are higher than E-way bill Generated)

Sir.(Continuation to the above query) client has not been caught by GST officials while moving Goods, only while reconciling GSTR-1 & Eway bill they have raised.the query.kindly educate how to go about!

Discrepancies Found in GSTR-1 Filings vs. E-way Bills; Rule 138 (14) Exceptions and Penalty Implications Discussed A user from a private company raised a query about discrepancies between GSTR-1 filings and E-way bills, specifically noting higher sales figures in GSTR-1 for transactions with a sister concern within a 10km radius. The issue was flagged during reconciliation, not during the movement of goods. Respondents advised checking Rule 138 (14) of the CGST Rules for exceptions, suggested that the discrepancy might incur a general penalty, and emphasized the importance of having evidence of actual goods sold. They also recommended issuing E-way bills in future transactions and reviewing Circular 171/2022 regarding penalties for fake invoicing. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Amit Agrawal on Jul 8, 2022

Please see Rule 138 (14) of the CGST Rules, 2017 and check if your case falls within any of those exceptions.

Shilpi Jain on Jul 9, 2022

This has not led to any loss to revenue. There could be a general penalty levied for this procedural lapse. Make a submission that you had thought there was an exemption for generating the EWB in these cases (assuming that is the reason EWB was not generated).

Also the department could consider or allege that you have issued invoices without supply of goods. In which case ensure you have sufficient evidence to prove that actually goods were sold.

Pls go through the Circular 171/2022 issued recently on fake invoicing to get further details on the penalty that could be levied.

Shilpi Jain on Jul 9, 2022

Ensure that in such cases in future the EWBs are issued.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues