Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Amendment of Rule 43 - Notification No.14/2022-CT dated 05/07/2022

Dipen Lathi

Respected Experts,

Rule 43 of the CGST Rules, 2017 has been amended vide Notification No.14/2022-CT dated 05/07/2022. Accordingly, sub-clause (d) has been added to Explanation 1 in the said rule. While going through the said rule on TMI site, I find that the sub-clause (d) as per the present amendment is added to explanation under Sub-rule 1 of Rule 43.

In my understanding, the amendment is made to Explanation 1 under sub-rule 2 of Rule 43 and not to the explanation under sub-rule 1. As such, adding the new sub-clause (d) to the explanation to sub-rule 1 does not make sense.

However, when read under sub-rule 2, Explanation 1 the new clause makes sense in that the value of duty credit scripts sold would not be considered as an exempt supply for the purpose of Rule 42 and 43.

I request the experts to kindly throw light on this. Is it an inadvertent error on TMI site or is it my misunderstanding? Thank you.

CA Dipen Lathi

Amendment to CGST Rule 43 Excludes Duty Credit Scripts from Exempt Supplies; Clarification on Website Error Provided A discussion on a forum addresses the amendment of Rule 43 of the CGST Rules, 2017, introduced by Notification No.14/2022-CT. The amendment adds sub-clause (d) to Explanation 1, which excludes the value of duty credit scripts from being considered as exempt supplies under Rules 42 and 43. A participant questioned whether the amendment was incorrectly placed under sub-rule 1 on a website. Another respondent clarified that the amendment applies to the entire Rule 43, not specifically to sub-rules 1 or 2. The error on the website was acknowledged and reportedly corrected. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues