Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Balance in electronic cash ledger

Umesh Babu

Sir/Madam,

after calculating March month liability,a company paid the amount in cash on 31st March.

Inadvertently, the cash payment was shown as ITC and GSTR-3B was filed. After 21 months the mistake was realized and DRC-03 with interest @ 18%, was filed voluntarily appropriating the balance in cash ledger which was not appropriated for 21 months.

Now in SCN, the interest is demanded for the 21 months @ 24%.

The query is, since the cash payment was genuine and appropriation was delayed, and amount was not utilised throughout the period of 21 months, can we escape from interest liability ,

Kindly clarify,

Umesh Babu

Company Disputes 24% Interest Demand for ITC Error; Argues No Revenue Loss, Seeks 18% Interest Instead A company mistakenly recorded a cash payment as Input Tax Credit (ITC) in their GSTR-3B filing for March, realizing the error 21 months later. They filed DRC-03 with 18% interest to rectify this. However, a Show Cause Notice (SCN) demands 24% interest for the 21-month delay. Respondents in the forum suggest that since there was no revenue loss, the interest demand may not be justified, and the interest should be 18%. They advise considering court action for relief, suggesting that procedural lapses should not incur penalties, and to pay interest under protest if necessary. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues