Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

SECTION 18(6) OF THE CGST ACT READ WITH RULES 40 AND 44

SOPL SOPL

Dear Sir

At the time of supply of capital goods on which input tax credit is taken, do we need to comply both the conditions i.e paying tax on transaction value and reversing input tax credit for remaining useful life of the asset (reducing total input by 5% per quarter)

or

is it sufficient to pay any one i.e higher of the above two conditions.

In CGST Act, 2017 ,it is clear if we pay higher of the both conditions.

Kindly provide your reply with analysis quoting circulars, clarifications , advance rulings if any.

Debate on CGST Act Section 18(6): Must Both Conditions Be Met for Capital Goods Tax and ITC Reversal? A discussion on the application of Section 18(6) of the CGST Act, 2017, and related rules, focused on whether both conditions-paying tax on transaction value and reversing input tax credit (ITC) for the remaining useful life of the asset-must be met upon the supply of capital goods. Participants debated if compliance with only the higher of the two conditions is sufficient. Some argued that paying taxes on the higher side, as calculated under Section 18(6) with Rules 40(2) or 44(6), is advisable to avoid disputes. Others emphasized that the law does not require double payment or ITC reversal. The discussion also touched on the implications of these provisions in situations like rental or destruction of capital goods. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues