Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Tax Invoice - Bill To Ship To Model

Kaustubh Karandikar

XYZ (Maharashtra) issued Tax Invoice as ‘Bill To: Madhya Pradesh’(PQR) and ‘Ship To: Gujarat’ (ABC). The invoice issued by XYZ accompanied the consignment, but the Tax Invoice in turn issued by PQR to ABC was not accompanying the consignment and was sent by courier by PQR to ABC. This consignment was seized by the check post authorities on the ground that the Tax Invoice of PQR issued to ABC was not accompanying the consignment. What is the correct legal requirement?

Debate on GST 'Bill To Ship To' Model: Is One E-Way Bill Enough? Insights on Section 68 & Rule 138A. A discussion on a forum addresses a legal issue regarding the 'Bill To Ship To' model under GST law. XYZ issued a tax invoice to PQR in Madhya Pradesh, shipping goods to ABC in Gujarat. The consignment was seized because PQR's invoice to ABC was not with the shipment. Participants argue that only one e-way bill is needed, either from XYZ or PQR, and that requiring both invoices with the consignment is impractical. They cite a press release clarifying that a single e-way bill suffices, aligning with Section 68 and rule 138A of GST law. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues