Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

reversal of common input credit used for both taxable and non taxable supplies

rao rao

As per 42 of CGST 2017 common input credit used for both taxable and non taxable supplies should be reversed. I want know whether credit can be availed after deducting the items mentioned in Rule 42 or it must be reversed after taking credit in GSTR 3B and then only reversed.

Debate on Input Credit Reversal Under GST: Rule 42 Compliance and GSTR 3B Reporting Procedures A forum discussion centered on the reversal of common input credit under GST, specifically concerning the use of credit for both taxable and non-taxable supplies as per Rule 42 of the CGST Act, 2017. Participants debated whether credit should be availed after deducting specified items or reversed after taking credit in GSTR 3B. Responses suggested showing all credits in table 4(A) and reversals in table 4(B) of GSTR 3B, with some emphasizing procedural compliance. It was noted that procedural lapses could be rectified in the GSTR-9 annual return, and the importance of maintaining separate accounts for taxable and non-taxable supplies was highlighted. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Ganeshan Kalyani on Jul 1, 2021

Sir, first you have to show all in table 4(A) and then show reversal in table 4(B) of GSTR 3B.

Shilpi Jain on Jul 1, 2021

Yes agree. However in case this kind of disclosure was missed you can make an intimation to dept else rectify the disclosure while filing GSTR-9 annual return

Atul Mehrotra on Jul 4, 2021

Dear Experts.

What would be the practical implication if a registered person avails net ITC i.e. the eligible portion without following the procedure laid down in rule 42?

Ganeshan Kalyani on Jul 10, 2021

The department would understand by referring what is furnished in the return. Then you have to justify that this is the net input tax credit. In my view, it is only procedural method and do not amount to non-compliance.

Shilpi Jain on Oct 16, 2021

Agree with Mr. Ganesh. Procedural aspects can be condoned and should not be leading to greater consequences.

KASTURI SETHI on Oct 16, 2021

Sh.Rao Rao Ji,

I think you are talking about maintenance of separate account for taxable and non-taxable supplies for the purpose of ITC.

In Section 17 of the CGST Act, 2017 as well as Rules 42 and 43 of the CGST Rules, 2017, there is no provision for exercising option like maintenance of separate account or payment of an amount of six or seven per cent of the value of exempted supplies, as it existed under erstwhile Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Such option/provision in Central Excise era was omitted vide Notification No.13/2016-C.E. (N.T.) dated 1-3-2016 because practically it was not viable.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues