Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Security Service by Other than body corporate to SEZ

KUMAR Narasimhan

Security Service done by other than body corporate to SEZ unit.

SEZ unit has to pay the tax under RCM. Please confirm, am I right?

GST Reverse Charge Not Applicable for SEZ Security Services; Zero-Rated Under IGST Section 16(1)(b). GSTR-1 Filing Issues Noted. A query was raised regarding the applicability of Goods and Services Tax (GST) under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) for security services provided to a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) unit by entities other than body corporates. It was clarified that SEZs are generally not liable to pay GST under RCM, as per departmental communication. The service is considered zero-rated under Section 16(1)(b) of the IGST Act, implying no tax liability for the service provider. However, an FAQ suggests SEZ units might be deemed suppliers under RCM, though this lacks statutory authority. The discussion also noted technical issues with GSTR-1 filings related to SEZ transactions. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues