Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Can LUT be used for the Export / SEZ sales prior to it applied

KUMAR Narasimhan

LUT is applied on 13th Mar 2021 for FY 2020 - 2021. Would the company is eligible to use this LUT for the Export and SEZ Sales prior to the apply of LUT fot the FY 20-21 (Means would it be eligible for the period April 2020 to 12th Mar 2021)

LUT for 2020-2021 Exports Must Be Executed Before Shipments; Delays May Be Excused with Supporting Documents Under CGST Rules 2017. A query was raised regarding the eligibility of using a Letter of Undertaking (LUT) for exports and SEZ sales before its application date for the fiscal year 2020-2021. The LUT was applied on March 13, 2021. According to responses, under CGST Rules 2017, a LUT must be furnished prior to export, and thus cannot cover exports made before its execution. Another contributor agreed but noted that delays might be condonable if supporting documents for actual exports exist. Additional legal judgments were suggested to support the case, emphasizing that procedural lapses should not deny substantial benefits. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues