Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

proceedings for recovery of late fee for TDS returns u/s 234E

tejas kulkarni

One of my client received notice for recovery of late fee of around ₹ 2 lakhs for delay in filing of TDS returns for f.y.2012-13. However as per my knowledge the STAY granted by Hon Kerala high court on recovery of such late fee pertaining to f.y.on or before 2015-16.

What is the position for this issue ?

Is any relief granted further by Hon court ?

Shall I file appeal or pay entire dues ?

Kindly reply if any one has updates.

Client Debates Appeal or Payment of 2 Lakh Late Fee for Delayed TDS Returns; Section 234E in Focus A client received a notice for a late fee of approximately 2 lakhs due to delayed TDS return filings for the fiscal year 2012-13. The client is aware of a Kerala High Court stay on such fees for fiscal years up to 2015-16 and seeks advice on whether to appeal or pay. One respondent, Dr. Mariappan Govindarajan, requested more details for case tracking, while another, CA Susheel Gupta, referenced a Karnataka High Court case, suggesting filing an appeal. The discussion revolves around the legal position and potential relief regarding late fee recovery under section 234E. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN on Mar 2, 2021

Your information to the query is not sufficient.

Please mention name of the parties and the case number so as to trace the present position of the said case.

CASusheel Gupta on Apr 14, 2021
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues