Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

shares transfer u/s 56(2)(vi)(c)

satbir singhwahi

Sir,

Shares of closely held company were purchased by director at fmv, but consideration was not paid . So now local court has ordered to return shares.Further application pending at company law tribunal to restore back shares to original allotees.

The issue is with income tax , Assessing Officer is charging income u/s 56(2)(vi)(c).pls guide.

Director Ordered to Return Unpaid Shares; Tax Implications Under Section 56(2)(vi)(c) Pending Tribunal Review A director purchased shares of a closely held company at fair market value (FMV) but did not pay for them, leading a local court to order the return of the shares. An application is pending at the company law tribunal to restore the shares to the original allottees. The issue arises with the Income Tax Department, where the Assessing Officer is charging income under section 56(2)(vi)(c). The case was also brought before Lok Adalat, resulting in the shares being returned to the original shareholders. Guidance is sought on the tax implications and ongoing tribunal proceedings. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues