Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 116146
Like 0 Bookmark

Supply of Invoice without goods

Date 16 Mar 2020
Replies 5 Replies
Views 6085 Views
Asked by
Burden of Proof for Input Tax Credit: substantiate purchases with supplier returns, GSTR 2A, bank proof and transport docs.
Assessee received goods through a broker and retains invoice and bank payment proof, but supplier denies the sale after a raid and broker absconded. To substantiate input tax credit, procure supplier GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B and confirm matches in your GSTR 2A, produce transport consignment notes or delivery proofs, and collate supplier ledger entries, bank payment evidence and lorry receipts. The burden to prove entitlement to credit rests on the claimant under Section 155 principles; lack of corroboration may prompt a show cause notice and litigation. (AI Summary)

Issue: Assesse has purchased yarn through broker and recieved Invoice. Seller in the Invoice was the party from which broker purchased yarn and sold to assesse. Now the issue is there has been departmental raid in Seller's office. Seller denied the above sale, despite of fact that the bill was in his name. The said broker fled away. Because of this Gst officer are pressurizing the assesse that this is case of bogus invoice u/s 122. But assesse has genuinely purchased those goods through broker. The only proof we have is Invoice and payment made to seller through bank. No E-way bill was active at that time. And assesse does not maintain any goods recieved note. Please guide us.

5 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues