Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Pre import conditions

Muthukumar Muthunarasimhan

As per earlier Notification in the customs act my client didn't comply the pre import conditions and cleared.the goods without payment of IGST . This happened for wrong interpretation of Notification no intention to evade tax. Now, DRI issued show cause notice and paid full IGST and relevant interest. Now DRI issued show cause notice for equal penality. Which provisions and case laws we can quote in our reply for waiver of penalty?

Client Faces Penalty for Misinterpreted Customs Notification; Pre-import Conditions Ruled Unconstitutional, Pending Supreme Court Decision A client failed to comply with pre-import conditions under a customs notification, leading to goods being cleared without IGST payment due to a misinterpretation. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) issued a show cause notice (SCN) for penalty after IGST and interest were paid. One reply suggests paying 15% of the penalty within 30 days under Section 28 of the Customs Act, emphasizing the burden of proof lies with the client. Another highlights a Gujarat High Court ruling declaring the pre-import condition unconstitutional, noting the Supreme Court has stayed this order but restricted DRI actions in Gujarat. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues