Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Dogs Security

Kaustubh Karandikar
XYZ(Proprietor) is providing ‘Dogs’ to PQR (Body Corporate) for security of their factory premises. Is PQR liable to pay GST under reverse charge or XYZ need to pay under forward charge?
Debate on GST classification for security dogs: Reverse charge or forward charge? Potential classification under service code 998529. In a discussion on the Goods and Services Tax (GST) implications for providing dogs for security services, participants debated whether the service falls under reverse charge mechanism (RCM) or forward charge. One participant argued that the supply of dogs does not qualify as a security service under RCM, which typically covers human security personnel. Another participant noted that watchdog services are idiomatic and not related to animals, suggesting that dogs for security should not be classified under live animals exempt from GST. Others agreed, emphasizing that providing dogs is not a sale transaction but a service, potentially falling under service code 998529 for other security services. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Alkesh Jani on Apr 17, 2019

Sir,

In this regards, I am of the view that, the Sl.No.14 of Notification No. 13/2017 amended vide Notification No. 29/2018, with effect from 1.1.2019, security service i.e. supply of security personnel are covered under RCM, various security services, as classified under HSN code 998521 to 998529, but only Security Services by way of supply of security personnel means persons (humans) are supplied for security purpose such as bouncers, Gun-man etc. are covered under RCM and not all Security Services.

Thanks,

With Regards

KASTURI SETHI on Apr 17, 2019

Nice reply by Sh.Alkesh Jani Ji. I agree with him. I further add that dogs cannot provide security service. Dog cannot replace human being for the purpose of security service.

In my view, supply of dogs falls under Chapter/Heading No. 0106 (Other Live animals) and this supply is exempted from GST.

 

SHARAD ANADA on Apr 18, 2019

XYZ is providing security services by using dogs and not supplying DOGS itself. In my view Chapter/Heading No. 0106 (Other Live animals) is not applicable. Service code 998525 includes Watchdog Services

Service code 998525 Guard services:

This service code includes providing protective services through hired personnel to ensure the safety of people or private, industrial and commercial properties by guarding them against fire, theft, vandalism or illegal entry, such as security patrol services, security guard services, bodyguard services, watchdog services, parking control services, access control services.

SHARAD ANADA on Apr 18, 2019

XYZ is under forward charges

KASTURI SETHI on Apr 18, 2019

Guard services (998525) do not include the security services provided by dog. The phrase "watchdog services' has nothing to do with the animal called dog. It is an idiomatic expression.A watchdog is a person or committee whose job is to make sure that companies do not act illegally or irresponsibly. If we split the word into watch dog, it is a guard dog. But here the word is one, 'Watchdog'. Means monitoring. We can say that media is playing the role of 'a watchdog' to curb social evils.

The term, "hired personnel" means people employed in an organization or engaged in an organized undertaking such as military service etc. Personnel stands for staff, employees, workforce, workers, labour force, manpower, human resources, people, men and women; crew, team, force, organization; As per legal dictionary meaning the word, 'Personnel' does not include animal. It is meant for human being only. It means "Guard Services (998525) " provided by a human being or a group of human beings'. Hence security service provided by dog is out of gamut of 'Guard Services'.

The term, 'Providing dogs' also means 'supplying' dogs.

KASTURI SETHI on Apr 18, 2019

"Watchdog services" also include security services provided by electronic/computerised devices installed at various places i.e. houses, factories, shops, offices, Govt. buildings, hospitals etc..

Ganeshan Kalyani on Apr 19, 2019

Nicely explained by Sri Kasturi Sir.

SHARAD ANADA on Apr 19, 2019

Thank you KASTURI SETHI sir for bringing my mistake in my notice. I think such service is covered under 998529 Other security services, n.e.c. This service code does not include computer security consulting services, cf. 998313. As I understood from the query supplier is not supplying dogs as sales transaction, hence Chapter/Heading No. 0106 (Other Live animals) should not be applicable. Because in any sale transaction 6 ingredients are necessary i.e. intervivos, Money Consideration, Willing buyer, Willing seller, Permanent alienation, Valid object. Here in this transaction Supplier is not seller of dog and recipient is not purchaser of dog and element of permanent alienation is missing. So its not sale transaction. and HSN of goods should not be applied. But SAC of service should be applied. Experts are requested to share their views.

KASTURI SETHI on Apr 19, 2019

Sh.Sharad Anada Ji, I agree with you in toto. You have really worked hard to trace out correct tariff code/ Chapter.

KASTURI SETHI on Apr 19, 2019

Sniffer dogs help a lot in investigation and nabbing the criminals.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues