Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 114624
Like 0 Bookmark

Refund under inverted structure

Date 14 Feb 2019
Replies 4 Replies
Views 2777 Views
Asked by
Refund under inverted duty structure: limited refund and non carryforward of unutilised input tax credit after prescribed period.
Rule 89(5) restricts refunds in inverted duty structures by excluding input services and capital goods credits from the refund formula, leaving unutilised service credit; Section 54 and its explanations confine the relevant date and period for claiming refunds, preventing indefinite accumulation or carryforward, and taxpayers may challenge Rule 89(5) judicially while administrative representation is an alternative. (AI Summary)

Dear sir,

Understand that, There is time limitation for claiming refund under inverted structure refund as 2 years from from the end of tax period for which the refund is sought.

Our case, falling under inverted duty structure. Whereby for refund eligibility, the input services and capital goods will not considered.

Considering the formula under rule 89(5), our ITC on inputs is very less considering the inverted duty liability. Resulting, the refund eligibility is arrived to nil..

Though we have excess ITC on services, the textile industry not in a position to use it.

This is an undue hardship faces the industry and working capital also badly impacting.

My question.

a. Any remedy available to overcome this issue.

B.after the period of 2 years, whether the ITC can be carry forwarded for future adjustment.

C. Pls share the outcome of the rajantan high court on the writ petition filed on 89(5).

D. How to resolve the WC issues.

Your reply will be more helpful for taking the final decisions.

With rwgards

Natarajan

4 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues