Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Inter Vs. Intra

ShaikhAbdulSamad Ahmad

Mr. India provides intermediary service to non resident company. As per section 13 of the IGST Act, 2017 states that PoS is place of provider of service, which destine it as Intra state. However, section 7(5)(c) of the IGST Act, 2017 colour the transaction as Inter state. Kindly clarify, whether it is Intra or inter.

Debate on GST: Are intermediary services to non-resident firms intra-state or inter-state under IGST Act, sections 7, 8, 13? A discussion on the classification of a service under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) framework in India revolves around whether intermediary services provided by an Indian company to a non-resident company should be considered intra-state or inter-state. The primary issue is the interpretation of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) Act, 2017, particularly sections 7, 8, and 13. The consensus suggests that if the non-resident company lacks a permanent establishment in India, the service is considered an export, thus liable for IGST. However, if services are performed in India, they may be subject to CGST and SGST as intra-state supply. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Rajagopalan Ranganathan on Jun 23, 2018

Sir,

You are providing intermediary service to non-resident company. Can you specify whether the non-resident company has any office or permanent establishment in India? If the non-resident company has its office or permanent establishment in India and such office/establishment is located in a State other than the State in which service provider is located then it will be inter-state supply.

If the service provider and the non-resident company has its office or permanent establishment in the same State then it will be intra-state supply.

Under sub-section (5) of Section 7 of IGST Act, 2017 " Supply of goods or services or both shall be treated to be a supply of goods or services or both in the course of inter-State trade or commerce provided -

(a) the supplier is located in India and the place of supply is outside India;

(b) to or by a Special Economic Zone developer or a Special Economic Zone unit; or

(c) in the taxable territory, not being an intra-State supply and not covered elsewhere in this section."

According to Section *8 (2) of IGST Act, 2017 " supply of services where the location of the supplier and the place of supply of services are in the same State or same Union territory shall be treated as intra-State supply."

Alkesh Jani on Jun 24, 2018

Sir,

First of all, Section 7 of IGST Act, 2017, is with regards to “Inter-State supply”. The Section 7 (5)(c) states that “(c) in the taxable territory, not being an intra-State supply and not covered elsewhere in this section”, and “taxable territory is defined at Section 2 (22) which is “(22) “taxable territory” means the territory to which the provisions of this Act apply;”. On cumulative reading it clears that provisions of this Act applies only to India and not the foreign land. Here it is important to note that taxable territory includes, terrestrial water, i.e. sea and sea bed even.

Further, Section 13 (1) of IGST Act, 2017, reads as “(1) The provisions of this section shall apply to determine the place of supply of services where the location of the supplier of services or the location of the recipient of services is outside India”. Even on plain reading it implies that supplies are received or supplied by the person located outside India (in simple words imported by an Indian importer), it shall be treated as inter-state and IGST is to be paid.

Our experts may correct me if mistaken.

Thanks

ShaikhAbdulSamad Ahmad on Jun 24, 2018

Dear Rajagopalan Sir,

The Non Resident company does not have any PE in India.

Thanks in advance

Rajagopalan Ranganathan on Jun 24, 2018

Sir,

According to Section 13 (2) of IGST Act, 2017 " the place of supply of services except the services specified in sub-sections (3) to (13) shall be the location of the recipient of services."

Since you have stated that the non-resident company does not have PE in India the supply of service will amount to export of service. Export of service can be done without payment of IGST under letter of undertaking/bond or on payment of IGST which can be claimed as refund.

Alkesh Jani on Jun 24, 2018

Sir,

I request our experts to review on following grounds;

The intermediary services provided by Mr. is not falling under the ambit of exports, as the said services are performed in India. Further, Section 13 (8) (b) of IGST Act, clearly specifies the intermediary services and also specifying the place of supply as the location of service provider, which is India in the instant case.

Our experts may correct me if mistaken.

Thanks

Rajagopalan Ranganathan on Jun 24, 2018

Sir,

Section 13 (8) (b) of IGST Act, 2017 stipulates that " the place of supply of services shall be the location of the supplier of services in the case of intermediary services." Therefore in the case of intermediary service though the receiver of the supply is outside the taxable territory . in such a situation whether igst or cgst+sgst is leviable. In my opinion since the service receiver is outside taxable territory igst is payable.

PAWAN KUMAR on Jun 25, 2018

As per my view, two options are as under:-

1-As per Igst act, if there is no physical presence of recipient in taxable territory then place of supply will be location of supplier, therefore liable for cgst,sgst being intra state supply.

2-In case of purely intermediary services, in such case place of supply will be lication of supplier, thus liable for cgst, sgst being intra state supply.

Alkesh Jani on Jul 2, 2018

Sir,

In my point of view, supply of goods or services, to be treated as intra-state, it shall satisfy the conditions of Section 8 (1) of IGST Act 2017, which reads as under

" 8. (1) Subject to the provisions of section 10, supply of goods where the location of the supplier and the place of supply of goods are in the same State or same Union territory shall be treated as intra-State supply...."

In the instant case, as the receiver is not within the same state, it does not qualifies the above conditions, so it cannot be treated as intra-state, hence, IGST is payable.

Our experts may correct me if mistaken.

Thanks

 

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues