Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Cenvat credit availed in Feb 2016 against capital goods invoice dated 08/2014

Kuldeep Kapoor

Due to oversight Capital goods invoice of year 08/2014 was misplaced and found in Feburary 2016 and and entry in RG 23 C -Part II made in Feburary 2014 . I already had cenvat of approximately 3 crore in books in Feburary 2016 and this was not utilized.

Please wether i should reverse the Cenvat amount in March 2017

Debate Over Cenvat Credit Validity for Misplaced 2014 Invoice Found in 2016: Circulars vs. Credit Rules Interpretation A participant queried about whether to reverse Cenvat credit taken in February 2016 for a capital goods invoice dated August 2014, which was misplaced and found later. Several replies were given. One response cited a circular indicating a one-year limit on claiming credit, but others argued that the credit was valid since it was availed within the second financial year, aligning with Credit Rules. Another highlighted the importance of accounting treatment and potential errors in the original query. Discussions also covered the non-binding nature of circulars and the significance of case law in interpreting regulations. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues