Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

purchase from same state and material delivered to another state

premchand talreja

we are based in Mumbai, we intend to purchase some machinery from maharastra based manufacturer and supply it to customer based in Rajasthan. The material will be directly transported by manufacturer to our end customer. what are the requirements and how should we treat this transaction.

Complex Tax Implications for Machinery Sale: In-Transit or Not? Conflicting Judgments Under CST Act, 1956 A business based in Mumbai plans to buy machinery from a manufacturer in Maharashtra and deliver it directly to a customer in Rajasthan. The query concerns the tax implications of this transaction. One respondent suggests it qualifies as an in-transit sale, requiring Form C/E1. Another disagrees, citing the CST Act, 1956, and arguing it is not an interstate sale since the intermediary is also in Maharashtra. The discussion highlights differing interpretations and the presence of conflicting judgments on the matter, emphasizing the complexity of tax treatment in such transactions. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues