7.
Sh.CS Sanjay Malhotra Ji,
Sir, Pl. throw more light on the following points which emerge from your reply on this issue:-
1. W.e.f. 10.9.2004, cenvat credit has been allowed across the board. By this way has the Govt. not widened or liberalised the the scope of the term, "in or in relation to the manufacture of the product'.
2. Head Office is being used for business meetings in relation to the manufacture of the excisable goods and other administrative work in relation to pre-manufacturing stage and post-manufacturing stage.
3. If any manufacturer has got Centralised registration or registered as ISD, what would be the fate of the Service Tax paid under the category of "Renting of Immovable Property" for the building of Head Office ?
Undoubtedly, immovable property is neither goods nor service, but renting is service. Can we not relate renting to the term, 'in relation to manufacture' in view of above scenario ?
Sir, I am looking forward to your views for clearing the air and hence enrichment of my knowledge.
Thanks & Regards.
K.L.SETHI