Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsAppJoin Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 109889
Like 0Bookmark

Central Excise Notification 2/2016-CE (NT) dated 3rd Feb-2016

Date 17 Feb 2016
Replies4 Replies
Views 5798 Views
Asked by
Prospective effect of notification permits issuance of show cause notices for periods before its effective date.
The notification operates prospectively from its publication and therefore does not bar the department from issuing show cause notices for periods prior to its effective date. The amendment clarifies treatment of credit utilisation so that reversal of wrongly taken credit, when sufficient balance exists, may be treated as non-utilisation to mitigate interest liability. The question on service tax credit eligibility for trading sales remains unanswered in the responses. (AI Summary)

Dear Expert,

Please guide us on above subject

We have take service tax credit of manufacturing commission under category f Bushiness auxiliary service and not utilized but in respect of Notification No. 6/2015-CE (NT) Para No.7 (2) for purposes of sub-rule (1), then we have revert above disputed service tax credit "under protest" and on monthly basis we have take credit, do not utilized, revert under protest & intimate to the department.there for we have received us two SCN 1st SCN pending at tribunal & 2nd pending at SCN issuing authority, also range superintendent get details for issue periodical SCN, till date department have not issue SCN. My question as above.

1. Now department issue Notification 2/2016-CE (NT) then department able to issue periodical SCN to us for the same.

2. What status of previous SCN pending at various authority.

3. Service tax credit on Trading sales eligible ?

4 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Like 0
Replied on Feb 17, 2016
1.

Sh.Yogesh Panchal Ji,

Notification No.2/2016-CE(NT) dated 3.2.2016 is applicable prospectivelyand not retrospectively.

 

Like 0
Replied on Feb 17, 2016
2.

Sir,

Date of issue of Notification No. 2/2016-CE (NT) dated 03.02.2016. The notification states that the amendments proposed in the notification will come into effect from the date of publication of the notification in the Official Gazette. This Notification is prospective in effect. Therefore the explanation inserted in rule 2 (l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 will come into effect only from 03.02.2016. Therefore the Department is not precluded from issuing the show cause notices for the period prior to 03.02.2016. Therefore they are valid.

Para 7 (2) of Notification No. 06/2015-CE (NT) dated 01.03.2015 stipulates how the Department will treat the utilization of credit by the assessee. This amendment was made to obviate various decisions of CESTAT/High Courts that if the balance available in the cenvat account of the assessee is sufficient to cove the wrong credit taken , the the credit wrongly taken shall be deemed to be not utilized and hence no interest is leviable when the wrong credit taken is reversed by the assessee.

Like 0
Replied on Feb 17, 2016
3.

Yes sir, we do endorse the above views.

Like 0
Replied on Feb 18, 2016
4.

Comprehensive and foolproof interpretation by Sh.Rajagopalan Ranganathan, Sir. Really appreciable.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues